Duke Divinity Call & Response Blog

Read. Discuss. Imagine.

 
  • Print
January 26, 2011

Mark Ralls: Tucson as privation of the good

A recent “Politico.com” post by Melinda Henneberger left me with both admiration and concern. Her title alone -- “The Christian Argument Against Obama’s and Palin’s View of Jared Loughner as ‘Evil’” --filled me with admiration. It’s rare these days to read someone able to think deeply and Christianly about contemporary events. Like Henneberger, I worry when I hear “evil” used as a descriptive term and applied to a specific person, especially a person like Jared Loughner who is so obviously ill.

Yet for people of faith to expunge the word “evil” from our vocabulary would be a great loss. Traditional Christian thought about evil has much to say to us about Tucson and similar tragedies.

As cancer is a deviation from a healthy cell and suffocation is the lack of oxygen, we know evil as privatio boni, the absence of the good.  This is what St. Augustine meant when he described evil as non-being. Evil is a tear, a breach, in the fabric of creation. 

This traditional view suggests that we should avoid thinking of evil as a personal attribute. To call a specific person “evil” is to suggest that he is qualitatively different from the rest of us. But each of us participates in our own way in non-being and is depleted by our own rebellious participation in the breach.

Henneberger includes a lengthy quote from Obama’s address that concerns her:

“Scripture tells us that there is evil in the world and that terrible things happen for reasons that defy human understanding. In the words of Job, ‘when I looked for light, then came darkness.’ Bad things happen, and we must guard against simple explanations in the aftermath.  For the truth is that none of us can know exactly what triggered this vicious attack. None of us can know with any certainty … what thoughts lurked in the inner recesses of a violent man’s mind.” 

For Henneberger, this comes much too close to rendering Loughner as a personification of evil. It “confuse[s] mental illness with wickedness.”

I heard these words differently. They seem to me an accurate depiction of the tear in the fabric of creation that occurred in Tucson. When Obama referred to the “inner recesses” of a “violent mind,” I believe he was suggesting that evil has the power to overtake any of us through minute, imperceptible advances.  This is something Christians must be willing to acknowledge.    

“60 Minutes” hosted an interview with two friends of Loughner’s. They used to get together four or five times a week to discuss philosophy. And their philosophy of choice was nihilism. One friend said this, ‘It wasn’t that Jared didn’t believe in anything. It’s that he actually believed in nothing. Loughner became obsessed with a film called “Waking Life” where a man considers different philosophies of life and finally settles upon nihilism.  He demonstrates his commitment by setting himself on fire.

Loughner deeply inhaled the fumes of our cultural nihilism. He celebrated his participation, which we all share, in the breech. To acknowledge that is not necessarily to separate Loughner from the rest of us. It may in fact reveal our own complicity, leading us to W. H. Auden’s acknowledgment that “evil sleeps in our bed and eats at our table.”

One of the things Loughner has to teach us is that of our own complicity in the Tucson tragedy. We do this by passively capitulating to our culture’s celebration of nothingness. Consider something as silly – and seemingly harmless -- as “Reality TV.” Shows like “The Jersey Shore” not only make light of terrible life choices. They glorify the wasted life. They propagate the cultural myth that our lives lack purpose. As Christians fail to counter this myth with prophetic utterance and interceding prayer, we are complicit in the cultivation of troubled young hearts and minds.

Shortly after the Columbine tragedy, art historian David Hickey observed that what most characterizes “the killer children from the suburbs is their absolute lack of imagination . . . They can’t imagine obliterating a million hopes, dreams and memories by squeezing a tiny metal trigger. They can’t imagine the empty space they are making in succeeding generations.” The empty space. That’s a good placeholder for the evil that occurred in both Columbine and Tucson.

Melinda Henneberger is right. We must not personify evil and casually ascribe it to someone else. Yet Barack Obama is more right. We must dare to speak of evil when we encounter it. Otherwise, we have no chance of recognizing it when it comes to “sleep in our bed, to eat at our table.”

Mark Ralls is senior pastor of Asbury First United Methodist Church in Rochester, New York.

6 Comments

eloquent and wise

An excellent essay. Just because this is evil does not mean the person who committed it not sick. Just because the person who committed this is sick, does not mean it is not evil. Loughner is a member of the species and clearly has inhaled from our culture. His uniquely hideous and twisted processing of the poison places him at the far end of a spectrum of response; our relatively better digestion does not transform the poison into steamed spinach and brown rice.

great read

I read this and gave it a lot of thought. It was very insightful. If you answer questions, could it be said he was possessed by a demon? At what point do we know or suspect something like that? To kill people you don't know for no reason definately comes across as evil. When it is done to multiple people for no reason, can it be attributed to demons? My thought is if John Doe hates people from PA and kills 20 people from PA, it is tragic and eveil but there is a goal or an "enemy." Random killings seem to lack that so does that lead to the thought of demons or evil spirits?

Woe to those who call evil

Woe to those who call evil good
and good evil,
who put darkness for light
and light for darkness,
who put bitter for sweet
and sweet for bitter.
Isaiah 5:20

Methodists make me tired. Your article runs rings around clarity until all your left with is goop. Loughner worshiped a skull and candles in his backyard. The person was a nut. We should pity him and pray for him and hope he repents and trusts in Jesus, before he is executed by the fine legal system in Arizona.

That well known liberal

St. Augustine, most clearly laid out the doctrine of evil as non-being. It's not a minimizing of evil's seriousness, it's the best philosophical explanation of what evil is (or is not). You are welcome to disdain Methodists and go around posting about it, but I can't let you think the privatio boni is some sort of mainline modern concoction.

the Bible certainly does

the Bible certainly does personify evil in the person of the Devil, you will not find "privatio boni" in the Bible and protestants should be wary of adopting the philosophical musings of a man in the place of scripture

I'll tell you what else isn't in the bible

"Sola scriptura," that's what.
You speak the way you do, Sola, because others taught you to. There is no tradition-less interpretation of the bible. Further, you actually believe lots of what the ancient church said about evil: you believe the demons are fallen angels, right? That humans are fallen creatures, right? All that language of fallenness suggests an original creation that's good. If you start believing in some sort of essential evil, with its own being independent of God, you fall quickly into Manicheanism. The devil and his angels act like they created themselves, and of course, that's precisely what rebellion is. None of this is contrary to the bible, none of it is liberal or conservative, it's rooted in the church's long wrestling with scripture in the power of the Spirit.

Post new comment

Comment Policy

* required field